![]() |
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
Analysis Several assumptions were made in the analysis. The FEA model was of one tube restrained at approx. 14.5" intervals along its length to simulate the tube-to-tube weld joint at those points. For model simplification purposes, the external air fins were neglected. Loading in the fore/aft direction was deemed insignificant due to tube geometry and resulting comparative strength in that direction. Thermal and internal pressure loading were not part of this analysis. To account for the mass of the coolant (density of water at 70° C) and air fins (not modeled), a stress and displacement multiplier was established. This was developed by calculating an equivalent material density (see hand-calculations) which was applied to the FEA model as a material property providing the results. All computer modeling and FEA was performed using SolidWorks 99 and Cosmos/Works V5, build 1999/197. Results & Conclusions The "Coolant and Air Fin Mass Multiplier" was determined to be 1.511. The radiator tube material, 6063-T6 Aluminum, properties are as follows:
The Endurance Limit of 10,000 psi is based on a fatigue life of 500,000,000 cycles, which is a common "design-life" used for Aluminum components. (Mechanical properties furnished by "Ryerson Stock List" catalog.) The following example explains what this 500 million cycle life means. If the radiator were installed in a vehicle which input loads at 12 cycles/second which resulted in a peak alternating stress of 10,000 psi in the tube, at an average run-time speed of 30 mph, the tube could be expected to live 347,222 miles (500 million cycles). At 15Gs a maximum stress of 785 psi (519 psi x 1.511 water mass factor) was calculated. This is far below the endurance limit of the material and therefore will not produce a failure within 500 million cycles. Recommendations Sincerely, Brian Merklein
Appendix
|
||||||